Experienced Bay Area Immigration Attorneys

Photo credit: Anita Mukherji

  1. Home
  2.  » 
  3. Firm News
  4.  » ICE’s reported use of “unaccompanied child” instead of “Unaccompanied Alien Child” a sign of trouble, not respect.

ICE’s reported use of “unaccompanied child” instead of “Unaccompanied Alien Child” a sign of trouble, not respect.

by | Jul 3, 2014 | Firm News |

Conservative websites Breitbart.com the National Review online have both reported that ICE has allegedly directed officers to stop using the term “Unaccompanied Alien Child” or “UAC” in reference to minors who attempt to cross the border without a parent or guardian, and instead simply refer to them as “unaccompanied children”.

Both articles focus on the dropping of the word “alien”, and imply that the change is due to decreasing use of that term. While “alien” is used in immigration laws, many find it offensive, and some media outlets have stopped using the term. While I would generally applaud elimination of the term “alien”, I think that this change would not be motivated by sensitivity, but rather efforts to eliminate the rights of children.

If these reports are true, the change in terminology is much more significant- and ominous than simply dropping the term “alien” would suggest. This is because “Unaccompanied Alien Child” is a legal term for someone entitled to rights President Obama has said that he wants eliminated.

The term “Unaccompanied Alien Child” comes from a law enacted under the Bush administration in which minors from countries other than Canada or Mexico who are apprehended trying to cross the border are given special protections. For example, they can only be detained in immigration facilities for a very limited time, and their cases are ultimately managed by the Department of Health and Human Services. They also have a right to hearing in front of an immigration judge, while others caught at the border often do not. Resources are generally more available to assist UAC’s to apply for any legal protections to which they may be entitled.

In response to the recent humanitarian crisis with minors from Central America, however, President Obama has said that he intends to ask Congress to eliminate these legal protections for Unaccompanied Alien Children. While this would theoretically reduce some of the current overcrowding and demand on government resources, it is a highly objectionable way to achieve this goal.

It is true that it is more difficult and time-consuming to provide UAC’s with the rights to which they are legally entitled. Nonetheless, this is time and money well-spent. Unaccompanied Alien Children are incredibly vulnerable, usually lacking the resources, education, or sophistication to survive on their own, much less demonstrate eligibility for immigration status to a border patrol agent.

Keep in mind that children crossing the border from Central America are fleeing extreme danger and horrific conditions. To speed up their deportation for the sake of efficiency is a horrible solution.

By eliminating references to an “Unaccompanied Alien Child”, however, it becomes rhetorically easier (or at least more consistent) for the Obama administration to argue that the term, and the rights associated with it, should also be taken away. It may also make it easier to apply guidance provided now to a near future in which the term “Unaccompanied Alien Child” is no longer used.

It appears, therefore, that referring to “Unaccompanied Alien Children” as “unaccompanied children” would not be a respectful acknowledgement that the term “alien” is offensive to many, but rather a way to ease the elimination of their rights. It is easier to argue that an Unaccompanied Alien Child should not get protections when you stop acknowledging the term.

Follow us on Twitter.


Big News- Firm Merger!

Bean + Lloyd, LLP and Park & Taylor to form Bean, Lloyd, Mukherji, & Taylor, LLP

We are thrilled to announce the merger of Bean + Lloyd, LLP and Park & Taylor, two highly respected Bay Area immigration law firms, beginning April 16, 2021. The new firm, Bean, Lloyd, Mukherji, & Taylor, LLP, combines decades of immigration experience in the subfields of family-based immigration, removal defense, asylum, humanitarian visas, and criminal immigration.

Partners Jesse Lloyd and Anita Mukherji, both certified specialists in immigration and nationality law by the California State Bar, will lead the firm. Karyn Taylor will join as Of Counsel, and Angela Bean will remain as partner and Anna von Herrmann as Of Counsel. The Park & Taylor staff will bring their two decades of experience to the team.

Bean, Lloyd, Mukherji, & Taylor, LLP, will maintain both its Oakland and San Francisco offices. While both offices will be temporarily closed to the public due to COVID-19, our staff will still be available by phone, email, and text message, and all consultations and client appointments will continue by phone or video. We look forward to reopening physically when it is safe to do so.

Please contact us at (510) 433-1900 or www.beanlloyd.com with any inquiries.

You have Successfully Subscribed!